Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung NX2000
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a155e/a155e32ab76bd18f46a3b00fd477c4639517dbc2" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS front Ricoh WG-5 GPS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d001/6d00199fa554daddf1699da91ea808290d954e81" alt="Samsung NX2000 front Samsung NX2000 front"
89 Imaging
63 Features
68 Overall
65
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung NX2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Released February 2015
- Replaced the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- New Model is Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 228g - 119 x 65 x 36mm
- Released November 2013
- Older Model is Samsung NX1100
- Later Model is Samsung NX3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung NX2000 Overview
Here is a detailed review of the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung NX2000, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and the NX2000 (20MP) is fairly similar but the WG-5 GPS (1/2.3") and NX2000 (APS-C) come with different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The WG-5 GPS was released 15 months later than the NX2000 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-5 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX2000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the WG-5 GPS scores vs the NX2000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung NX2000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung NX2000. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery and Samsung NX2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Samsung NX2000
WG-5 GPS | NX2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | ![]() | November 2013 | Fresher by 15 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX2000 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
NX2000 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3.7" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.7") |
Display resolution | 1152k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung NX2000
WG-5 GPS | NX2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung NX2000 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS offers external dimensions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX2000 has proportions of 119mm x 65mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 228 grams (0.50 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung NX2000 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the WG-5 GPS vs the NX2000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59e8b/59e8b6426488de4d9598b764b92a372cef205885" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung NX2000 size comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung NX2000 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-5 GPS and NX2000 is 90 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/169b8/169b844614f4b9c837aaacfb072bc164d93aee17" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung NX2000 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung NX2000 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung NX2000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizing only by going over specifications. The graphic below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-5 GPS and NX2000.
To sum up, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The WG-5 GPS due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Samsung NX2000 will offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The newer WG-5 GPS provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a769b/a769bf4855c19c41f540b60ad86ba0f13a9c5a53" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung NX2000 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung NX2000 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5fd4d/5fd4d4d23cb1fa9d084b9528421d81890d64022c" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung NX2000 Specifications
Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung NX2000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung NX2000 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2015-02-10 | 2013-11-30 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 1,152k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 14.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 236 grams (0.52 lb) | 228 grams (0.50 lb) |
Dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 119 x 65 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 75 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 908 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | 340 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-LI92 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC/ MicroSDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $500 | $599 |