Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung PL200
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
94 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Earlier Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Successor is Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced July 2010
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung PL200, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-5 GPS was announced 4 years later than the PL200 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the WG-5 GPS grades vs the PL200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung PL200. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery and Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Samsung PL200
WG-5 GPS | PL200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2015 | July 2010 | Fresher by 56 months | |
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
PL200 | WG-5 GPS |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung PL200
WG-5 GPS | PL200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera often, you should factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS enjoys outer dimensions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Samsung PL200 has specifications of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung PL200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the WG-5 GPS against the PL200.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-5 GPS and PL200 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing just by checking out technical specs. The visual underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-5 GPS and PL200.
As you have seen, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to provide more detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more recent WG-5 GPS provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung PL200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung PL200 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2015-02-10 | 2010-07-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 14.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 236 grams (0.52 lbs) | 170 grams (0.37 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $500 | $0 |