Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB35F
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Earlier Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB35F, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-5 GPS was announced 14 months later than the WB35F which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the WG-5 GPS grades vs the WB35F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-5 GPS & Samsung WB35F. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Samsung WB35F
WG-5 GPS | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | January 2014 | Fresher by 14 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
WB35F | WG-5 GPS |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung WB35F
WG-5 GPS | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS enjoys physical dimensions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB35F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-5 GPS compared to the WB35F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-5 GPS and WB35F is 90 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizing only by reading a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-5 GPS and WB35F.
Clearly, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical resolution and you can expect similar quality of files but you should always consider the age of the products into consideration. The fresher WG-5 GPS should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung WB35F |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2015-02-10 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 14.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 236g (0.52 lb) | 194g (0.43 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $500 | $130 |