Clicky

Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB35F

Portability
90
Imaging
41
Features
44
Overall
42
Ricoh WG-5 GPS front
 
Samsung WB35F front
Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs

Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
  • Revealed February 2015
  • Earlier Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
  • Replacement is Ricoh WG-6
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Launched January 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB35F Overview

Its time to look much closer at the Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB35F, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The WG-5 GPS was announced 14 months later than the WB35F which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the WG-5 GPS grades vs the WB35F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Samsung WB35F

 WG-5 GPS WB35F 
LaunchedFebruary 2015January 2014Fresher by 14 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS

 WB35F WG-5 GPS 

Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung WB35F

 WG-5 GPS WB35F 
Manual focus More precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither features Touch friendly screen

Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS enjoys physical dimensions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

Contrast the Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB35F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-5 GPS compared to the WB35F.

Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB35F size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-5 GPS and WB35F is 90 and 93 respectively.

Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizing only by reading a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-5 GPS and WB35F.

Clearly, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical resolution and you can expect similar quality of files but you should always consider the age of the products into consideration. The fresher WG-5 GPS should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Portrait photography with Samsung WB35F
41
focusing manually
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has face detection autofocus
no manual control
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
37
focusing manually
good resolution (16MP)
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-5 GPS Street photography features
Samsung WB35F Street photography features
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
more heavy than average (236 grams)
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (194g)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sports photography advice
Samsung WB35F Sports photography advice
49
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
weather proof
small sensor (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (240 shots)
lacks phase detect autofocus
40
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-5 GPS Travel photography features
Samsung WB35F Travel photography features
69
weather proof
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
terrible battery life (240 shots)
more heavy than average (236g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
70
lighter than competitors (194g)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
very long reach (288mm)
does not have Timelapse function
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-5 GPS as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Landscape photography camera
54
focusing manually
pretty wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen is a decent size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
weather proof
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
terrible battery life (240 CIPA)
43
focusing manually
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
small screen (2.7 inch)
no manual exposure
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
does not have Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Vlogging with Samsung WB35F
34
pretty wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone socket
more heavy than average (236 grams)
31
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (194g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
display is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external microphone jack
Photography Glossary

Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB35F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung WB35F
 Ricoh WG-5 GPSSamsung WB35F
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh WG-5 GPS Samsung WB35F
Type Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2015-02-10 2014-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 125 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 9 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-100mm (4.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.0-4.9 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 460 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 14.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) -
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 236g (0.52 lb) 194g (0.43 lb)
Physical dimensions 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 240 images -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID D-LI92 BP70A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $500 $130