Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A3000
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a155e/a155e32ab76bd18f46a3b00fd477c4639517dbc2" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS front Ricoh WG-5 GPS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5aaf5/5aaf587e29a179629037a7974702d099625cbb1e" alt="Sony Alpha A3000 front Sony Alpha A3000 front"
69 Imaging
62 Features
54 Overall
58
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Announced February 2015
- Earlier Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- New Model is Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
- Released August 2013
- Replacement is Sony a3500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A3000 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A3000, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and the A3000 (20MP) is pretty well matched but the WG-5 GPS (1/2.3") and A3000 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The WG-5 GPS was released 18 months after the A3000 which makes them a generation away from each other. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-5 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony A3000 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the WG-5 GPS grades versus the A3000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A3000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Sony Alpha A3000. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery and Sony A3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Sony A3000
WG-5 GPS | A3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | ![]() | August 2013 | More modern by 18 months |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A3000 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
A3000 | WG-5 GPS |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Sony A3000
WG-5 GPS | A3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A3000 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS has got external dimensions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Sony A3000 has sizing of 128mm x 91mm x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") and a weight of 411 grams (0.91 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A3000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the WG-5 GPS and the A3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3be89/3be89ff6458f9be7ed8b7efd7ea8660999cc0656" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A3000 size comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A3000 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-5 GPS and A3000 is 90 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18cab/18cab60e52090a4af3eb5ba9e09f406ee8797fe9" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A3000 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A3000 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A3000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizes merely by checking technical specs. The picture here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-5 GPS and A3000.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The WG-5 GPS featuring a tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony A3000 will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The more modern WG-5 GPS is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d872/2d8720d7a50368b0ac7d4c66c412178660a5cd0b" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A3000 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A3000 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc658/fc658337df2f71a37f4f929f20b0e6a203aa6300" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A3000 Specifications
Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Sony Alpha A3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Sony Alpha A3000 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2015-02-10 | 2013-08-27 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | BIONZ image |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5456 x 3632 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 16000 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.47x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 14.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100) |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync. |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD, H.264, MP4 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 236 grams (0.52 pounds) | 411 grams (0.91 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.8 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1068 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photographs | 470 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $500 | $398 |