Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A6400
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
83 Imaging
68 Features
88 Overall
76
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A6400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Released February 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Increase to 102400)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 403g - 120 x 67 x 50mm
- Announced January 2019
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A6400 Overview
Below is a complete assessment of the Ricoh WG-5 GPS versus Sony A6400, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and A6400 (24MP) and the WG-5 GPS (1/2.3") and A6400 (APS-C) have different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WG-5 GPS was launched 4 years earlier than the A6400 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-5 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony A6400 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the WG-5 GPS grades vs the A6400 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A6400 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-5 GPS & Sony Alpha a6400. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery & Sony A6400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Sony A6400
| WG-5 GPS | A6400 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6400 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| A6400 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2019 | February 2015 | More recent by 47 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 922k | 460k | Crisper display (+462k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Sony A6400
| WG-5 GPS | A6400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A6400 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera often, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS provides exterior dimensions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Sony A6400 has measurements of 120mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") having a weight of 403 grams (0.89 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-5 GPS versus Sony A6400 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at the time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the WG-5 GPS versus the A6400.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the WG-5 GPS and A6400 is 90 and 83 respectively.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A6400 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements merely by checking out a spec sheet. The visual here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-5 GPS and A6400.
As you can see, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WG-5 GPS featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF trickier and the Sony A6400 will produce more detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics more aggressively. The older WG-5 GPS will be behind in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A6400 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A6400 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Sony Alpha a6400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Sony Alpha a6400 |
| Class | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Released | 2015-02-10 | 2019-01-15 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 24MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 32000 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 425 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 121 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 14.0 frames per second | 11.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Off, auto, on, slow sync, rear sync, redeye reduction, wireless, hi-speed sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, XAVC-S |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 236 gr (0.52 pounds) | 403 gr (0.89 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 120 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 83 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.6 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1431 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | 410 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick DUO (UHS-I compliant) |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $500 | $898 |