Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung GX-1S
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2017
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Released January 2006
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
Here is a extensive comparison of the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung GX-1S, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the WG-50 (16MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the WG-50 (1/2.3") and GX-1S (APS-C) feature different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe WG-50 was announced 11 years later than the GX-1S and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the WG-50 grades against the GX-1S when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-50 & Samsung GX-1S. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Samsung GX-1S
WG-50 | GX-1S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2017 | January 2006 | Fresher by 139 months | |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 210k | Clearer screen (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Ricoh WG-50
GX-1S | WG-50 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung GX-1S
WG-50 | GX-1S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-50 enjoys outer measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung GX-1S has proportions of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung GX-1S in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the WG-50 compared to the GX-1S.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WG-50 and GX-1S is 91 and 68 respectively.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizing purely by going through technical specs. The visual below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-50 and GX-1S.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The WG-50 with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Ricoh WG-50 will provide greater detail with its extra 10MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The newer WG-50 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung GX-1S | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung GX-1S |
Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2017-05-24 | 2006-01-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 6MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3008 x 2008 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 210k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
Flash modes | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 193 gr (0.43 lb) | 605 gr (1.33 lb) |
Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/MMC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $280 | $850 |