Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ac2e/3ac2ec410ac86be34c3479c4117466c247b1411d" alt="Ricoh WG-50 front Ricoh WG-50 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f04d9/f04d99e0c26c31be60485c208bc04019fbc69c93" alt="Sigma DP2 Merrill front Sigma DP2 Merrill front"
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2017
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Launched February 2012
- Old Model is Sigma DP1 Merrill
- New Model is Sigma DP3 Merrill
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Ricoh WG-50 and Sigma DP2 Merrill, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the WG-50 (16MP) and the DP2 Merrill (15MP) is fairly comparable but the WG-50 (1/2.3") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) boast different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The WG-50 was revealed 5 years after the DP2 Merrill which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the WG-50 grades versus the DP2 Merrill when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-50 & Sigma DP2 Merrill. The full galleries are available at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
WG-50 | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2017 | ![]() | February 2012 | More modern by 65 months |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Ricoh WG-50
DP2 Merrill | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Sigma DP2 Merrill
WG-50 | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-50 has got external dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Merrill has sizing of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") accompanied by a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-50 and Sigma DP2 Merrill in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-50 compared to the DP2 Merrill.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/579f0/579f082187cfdb73e4bbd0e3bd0c82d7e83a5585" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-50 and DP2 Merrill is 91 and 83 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a29f2/a29f2db1fd812d5f9897691bb6bb25f1ea466a98" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizes just by seeing technical specs. The pic below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-50 and DP2 Merrill.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The WG-50 using its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh trickier and the Ricoh WG-50 will show extra detail because of its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more recent WG-50 provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36eec/36eec3ef228574b9ac03758ffb21aa6aa4c4c338" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61bab/61bab11744ff1af06501f8411ac06863db2a8341" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2017-05-24 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4704 x 3136 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | On, off | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640x480 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) | 330 grams (0.73 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $280 | $931 |