Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A300
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
![Ricoh WG-50 front Ricoh WG-50 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-WG-50/Ricoh-WG-50-front.jpg)
![Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/nolens/Sony-Alpha-DSLR-A300-ek-fn.jpg)
64 Imaging
49 Features
45 Overall
47
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched May 2017
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Announced January 2008
- Successor is Sony A330
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A300 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A300, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the WG-50 (16MP) and A300 (10MP) and the WG-50 (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) provide different sensor sizing.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The WG-50 was announced 9 years after the A300 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the WG-50 matches up against the A300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A300 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-50 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Sony A300
WG-50 | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2017 | ![]() | January 2008 | Newer by 114 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Ricoh WG-50
A300 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Sony A300
WG-50 | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Same display measurement |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-50 features outside measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sony A300 has sizing of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") along with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A300 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-50 against the A300.
![Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A300 size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A300 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Ricoh-WG-50-vs-Sony-Alpha-DSLR-A300-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-50 and A300 is 91 and 64 respectively.
![Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Ricoh-WG-50-vs-Sony-Alpha-DSLR-A300-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions only by researching technical specs. The pic underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-50 and A300.
As you can tell, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The WG-50 with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Ricoh WG-50 will result in more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The fresher WG-50 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
![Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Ricoh-WG-50-vs-Sony-Alpha-DSLR-A300-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
![Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Ricoh-WG-50-vs-Sony-Alpha-DSLR-A300-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A300 Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2017-05-24 | 2008-01-30 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | On, off | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) | 632 grams (1.39 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | Compact Flash |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $280 | $0 |