Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony H400
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
62 Imaging
45 Features
41 Overall
43
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony H400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2017
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-1550mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 628g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Announced February 2014
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony H400 Overview
Following is a in depth comparison of the Ricoh WG-50 and Sony H400, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the WG-50 (16MP) and the H400 (20MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe WG-50 was manufactured 3 years after the H400 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Sony H400 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the WG-50 grades vs the H400 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony H400 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-50 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Sony H400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Sony H400
WG-50 | H400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2017 | February 2014 | More modern by 40 months | |
Manually focus | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony H400 over the Ricoh WG-50
H400 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Sony H400
WG-50 | H400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony H400 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-50 provides outside dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sony H400 has dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") with a weight of 628 grams (1.38 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-50 and Sony H400 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the WG-50 vs the H400.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-50 and H400 is 91 and 62 respectively.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony H400 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes purely by looking through specs. The pic here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-50 and H400.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Sony H400 to result in greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more modern WG-50 will have an edge in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony H400 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony H400 Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2017-05-24 | 2014-02-13 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz(R) |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5152 x 3864 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-1550mm (62.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.4-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 8.80 m |
Flash options | On, off | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 X 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) | 628 grams (1.38 pounds) |
Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | 300 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $280 | $268 |