Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony T90
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
![Ricoh WG-50 front Ricoh WG-50 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-WG-50/Ricoh-WG-50-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T90/Sony-T90-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony T90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2017
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 148g - 94 x 57 x 15mm
- Announced February 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony T90 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Ricoh WG-50 versus Sony T90, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the WG-50 (16MP) and T90 (12MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
The WG-50 was revealed 8 years later than the T90 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Sony T90 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the WG-50 matches up against the T90 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony T90 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-50 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery and Sony T90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Sony T90
WG-50 | T90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2017 | ![]() | February 2009 | Fresher by 101 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T90 over the Ricoh WG-50
T90 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Sony T90
WG-50 | T90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony T90 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera often, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-50 offers physical measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Sony T90 has sizing of 94mm x 57mm x 15mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.6") having a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-50 versus Sony T90 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-50 and the T90.
![Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony T90 size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony T90 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Ricoh-WG-50-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T90-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-50 and T90 is 91 and 96 respectively.
![Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony T90 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony T90 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Ricoh-WG-50-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T90-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony T90 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing merely by viewing technical specs. The graphic below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-50 and T90.
As you have seen, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-50 to provide you with more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos more aggressively. The younger WG-50 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
![Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony T90 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony T90 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Ricoh-WG-50-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T90-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony T90 Screen and ViewFinder
![Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony T90 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony T90 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Ricoh-WG-50-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T90-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony T90 Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 |
Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Released | 2017-05-24 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.5-10.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) | 148 gr (0.33 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 94 x 57 x 15mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $280 | $259 |