Clicky

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony W320

Portability
91
Imaging
42
Features
39
Overall
40
Ricoh WG-50 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front
Portability
97
Imaging
37
Features
21
Overall
30

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony W320 Key Specs

Ricoh WG-50
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Launched May 2017
Sony W320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
  • Released January 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony W320 Overview

Its time to take a closer look at the Ricoh WG-50 and Sony W320, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the WG-50 (16MP) and the W320 (14MP) is relatively well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The WG-50 was brought out 7 years later than the W320 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summary of how the WG-50 matches up versus the W320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Sony W320

 WG-50 W320 
ReleasedMay 2017January 2010More recent by 90 months
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Ricoh WG-50

 W320 WG-50 

Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Sony W320

 WG-50 W320 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing2.7"2.7"Equivalent screen measurements
Screen resolution230k230kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-50 provides outer measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sony W320 has specifications of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") and a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

Compare the Ricoh WG-50 and Sony W320 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at the time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the WG-50 versus the W320.

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony W320 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-50 and W320 is 91 and 97 respectively.

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements only by looking at specifications. The visual underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-50 and W320.

Plainly, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Ricoh WG-50 to resolve extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The fresher WG-50 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-50 Portrait photography details
Sony W320 Portrait photography details
42
has manual focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has face detection focusing
no manual mode
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
28
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh WG-50
Street photography with Sony W320
62
built in image stabilization (Digital)
weather proof
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
49
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-50 Sports photography details
Sony W320 Sports photography details
49
built in image stabilization (Digital)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
weather proof
no shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
26
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
max fps very slow (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-50 Travel photography details
Sony W320 Travel photography details
71
weather proof
MP count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
66
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (26mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
does not contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-50 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony W320 as a Landscape photography camera
48
has manual focus
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
MP count decent (16MP)
weather proof
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
33
relatively wide (26mm)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual mode not possible
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
lack of Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh WG-50
Vlogging with Sony W320
33
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
has face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have external mic support
26
relatively wide (26mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
does not contain selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of microphone jack
Photography Glossary

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony W320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-50 and Sony W320
 Ricoh WG-50Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
General Information
Brand Ricoh Sony
Model Ricoh WG-50 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
Class Waterproof Ultracompact
Launched 2017-05-24 2010-01-07
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 125 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 26-105mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.5 f/2.7-5.7
Macro focus range 1cm 4cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 1 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 8.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) 4.80 m
Flash modes On, off Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Yes (Wireless) None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 193 gr (0.43 lbs) 117 gr (0.26 lbs)
Dimensions 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photographs -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model D-LI92 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Retail cost $280 $269