Ricoh WG-6 vs Sony NEX-C3
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07dc5/07dc58b4a79864661a81726797271145ae172467" alt="Ricoh WG-6 front Ricoh WG-6 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2cec1/2cec10f20284888a461f10799c9bdd17f4863091" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front"
91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
Ricoh WG-6 vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Revealed August 2011
- Succeeded the Sony NEX-3
- Successor is Sony NEX-F3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-6 vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Ricoh WG-6 vs Sony NEX-C3, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Sony. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the WG-6 (20MP) and NEX-C3 (16MP) and the WG-6 (1/2.3") and NEX-C3 (APS-C) use different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The WG-6 was introduced 6 years later than the NEX-C3 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-6 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise summation of how the WG-6 matches up against the NEX-C3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh WG-6 vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-6 and Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-6 Gallery and Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Sony NEX-C3
WG-6 | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2018 | ![]() | August 2011 | More recent by 80 months |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper screen (+120k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Ricoh WG-6
NEX-C3 | WG-6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-6 and Sony NEX-C3
WG-6 | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-6 vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-6 has got outside dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sony NEX-C3 has specifications of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-6 vs Sony NEX-C3 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the WG-6 and the NEX-C3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6fa25/6fa255839438e6415dedcf5c6ed4f7318646e9ac" alt="Ricoh WG-6 vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison Ricoh WG-6 vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-6 and NEX-C3 is 89 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b669/1b6697b223177e05b21ac58c7d1e612b42f19ecf" alt="Ricoh WG-6 vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-6 vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-6 vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to picture the difference between sensor measurements merely by reading through specs. The photograph here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-6 and NEX-C3.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WG-6 with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Ricoh WG-6 will give you extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more modern WG-6 should have an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7c1e/f7c1e76ce6af835b00b0f09710f03a74de5fdda7" alt="Ricoh WG-6 vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-6 vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-6 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6890c/6890c40e73460b4bbe623693f868d2e11fb9f736" alt="Ricoh WG-6 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-6 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh WG-6 vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
Ricoh WG-6 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-6 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2018-02-21 | 2011-08-22 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 6.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Flash on, flash off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840x2160 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Supports FlashAir SD cards | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 246 gr (0.54 pounds) | 225 gr (0.50 pounds) |
Dimensions | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1083 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 images | 400 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $271 | $343 |