Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX3000
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5df4a/5df4a7bd7b9b88dd2f51805c9d7765d7c23b749f" alt="Ricoh WG-70 front Ricoh WG-70 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de65b/de65bfe186e39934ff695656a2380e8b4549eaed" alt="Samsung NX3000 front Samsung NX3000 front"
89 Imaging
63 Features
62 Overall
62
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 230g - 117 x 66 x 39mm
- Revealed May 2014
- Previous Model is Samsung NX2000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX3000 Overview
In this article, we will be reviewing the Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX3000, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-70 (16MP) and the NX3000 (20MP) is pretty close but the WG-70 (1/2.3") and NX3000 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The WG-70 was revealed 5 years after the NX3000 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX3000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the WG-70 matches up vs the NX3000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX3000 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung NX3000. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery and Samsung NX3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Samsung NX3000
WG-70 | NX3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2020 | ![]() | May 2014 | Newer by 70 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX3000 over the Ricoh WG-70
NX3000 | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung NX3000
WG-70 | NX3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX3000 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-70 enjoys physical dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung NX3000 has proportions of 117mm x 66mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX3000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the WG-70 compared to the NX3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7819/c781968be79782b73288c09f95d05b944765310e" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX3000 size comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX3000 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the WG-70 and NX3000 is 91 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bcd76/bcd764c197c04de25f80580235eca55251a7b422" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX3000 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX3000 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX3000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions just by looking through specifications. The picture below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-70 and NX3000.
To sum up, the 2 cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The WG-70 using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Samsung NX3000 will result in more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The younger WG-70 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/665d2/665d2566b5dd1c2f76e0d9bd94e6ea5e2ef42577" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX3000 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX3000 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a392/6a3928dbce45a80fcab0d80dd18b4e566d9c05b2" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung NX3000 Specifications
Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung NX3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung NX3000 |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2020-02-04 | 2014-05-26 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 35 |
Cross focus points | - | 1 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 461k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | On, off | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) |
Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 117 x 66 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | 370 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | B740 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2-30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $280 | $897 |