Clicky

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL720

Portability
91
Imaging
43
Features
39
Overall
41
Ricoh WG-70 front
 
Samsung SL720 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL720 Key Specs

Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Announced February 2020
  • Replacement is Ricoh WG-80
Samsung SL720
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Introduced July 2009
  • Alternative Name is PL70
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL720 Overview

Lets take a more detailed look at the Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL720, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the WG-70 (16MP) and SL720 (12MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The WG-70 was launched 10 years after the SL720 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL720 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the WG-70 grades against the SL720 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Samsung SL720

 WG-70 SL720 
IntroducedFebruary 2020July 2009More modern by 129 months
Focus manually More exact focusing

Reasons to pick Samsung SL720 over the Ricoh WG-70

 SL720 WG-70 

Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung SL720

 WG-70 SL720 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size2.7"2.7"Same display measurement
Display resolution230k230kEqual display resolution
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch display Neither has Touch display

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL720 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-70 has external dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL720 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

Look at the Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL720 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-70 versus the SL720.

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL720 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-70 and SL720 is 91 and 94 respectively.

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL720 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL720 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's hard to see the gap between sensor sizes just by looking at technical specs. The picture below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-70 and SL720.

As you can tell, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-70 to give extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more recent WG-70 is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL720 sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL720 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL720 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 Portrait photography information
Samsung SL720 Portrait photography information
42
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (16MP)
provides face detect focus
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
21
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 Street photography features
Samsung SL720 Street photography features
62
has image stabilization (Digital)
environment proofing
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
47
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
more heavy than competition (168g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh WG-70
Sports photography with Samsung SL720
50
has image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
provides tracking focus
environment proofing
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
17
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung SL720 as a Travel photography camera
71
environment proofing
megapixel count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
56
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (168g)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung SL720 Landscape photography highlights
49
focusing manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
environment proofing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not available
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
27
pretty wide (28mm)
lack of manual focus
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-70 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung SL720 as a Vlogging camera
33
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
provides face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of microphone jack
25
pretty wide (28mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have external microphone socket
more heavy than competition (168g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL720 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung SL720
 Ricoh WG-70Samsung SL720
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh WG-70 Samsung SL720
Also referred to as - PL70
Category Waterproof Ultracompact
Announced 2020-02-04 2009-07-14
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 6400 1600
Lowest native ISO 125 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Max aperture f/3.5-5.5 f/2.8-5.7
Macro focusing distance 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 8s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1500s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) 4.60 m
Flash options On, off Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Yes (Wireless) None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 193g (0.43 lbs) 168g (0.37 lbs)
Physical dimensions 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photographs -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID - SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $280 $119