Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL720
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
94 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL720 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced February 2020
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Alternative Name is PL70
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL720 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL720, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the WG-70 (16MP) and SL720 (12MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-70 was launched 10 years after the SL720 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL720 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the WG-70 grades against the SL720 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL720 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung SL720. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery and Samsung SL720 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Samsung SL720
| WG-70 | SL720 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2020 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 129 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL720 over the Ricoh WG-70
| SL720 | WG-70 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung SL720
| WG-70 | SL720 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Same display measurement |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL720 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-70 has external dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL720 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL720 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-70 versus the SL720.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-70 and SL720 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL720 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to see the gap between sensor sizes just by looking at technical specs. The picture below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-70 and SL720.
As you can tell, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-70 to give extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more recent WG-70 is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL720 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung SL720 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung SL720 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung SL720 |
| Also referred to as | - | PL70 |
| Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2020-02-04 | 2009-07-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 193g (0.43 lbs) | 168g (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $280 | $119 |
