Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL100
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
91 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 219g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Announced January 2009
- Alternative Name is ST50
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL100 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung TL100, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the WG-70 (16MP) and TL100 (12MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-70 was released 11 years later than the TL100 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a simple view of how the WG-70 scores versus the TL100 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL100 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung TL100. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery and Samsung TL100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Samsung TL100
| WG-70 | TL100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2020 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 135 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL100 over the Ricoh WG-70
| TL100 | WG-70 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung TL100
| WG-70 | TL100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Same screen size |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL100 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera often, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-70 has outside measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL100 has proportions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 219 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung TL100 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the WG-70 versus the TL100.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-70 and TL100 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL100 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing only by seeing specifications. The visual here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-70 and TL100.
Plainly, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Ricoh WG-70 to provide extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more recent WG-70 should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL100 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung TL100 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung TL100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung TL100 |
| Also called as | - | ST50 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2020-02-04 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.0-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash options | On, off | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 800 x 592 (20 fps) , 640 x 480 (30,15 fps) , 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 193 gr (0.43 lb) | 219 gr (0.48 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $280 | $22 |