Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB1100F
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
67 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB1100F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 512g - 125 x 87 x 96mm
- Announced January 2014
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB1100F Overview
Below is a in-depth assessment of the Ricoh WG-70 versus Samsung WB1100F, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-70 (16MP) and the WB1100F (16MP) is very similar and they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-70 was manufactured 6 years later than the WB1100F and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB1100F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the WG-70 scores vs the WB1100F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB1100F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-70 & Samsung WB1100F. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery & Samsung WB1100F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Samsung WB1100F
WG-70 | WB1100F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2020 | January 2014 | More recent by 74 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB1100F over the Ricoh WG-70
WB1100F | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung WB1100F
WG-70 | WB1100F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB1100F Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-70 enjoys outer dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Samsung WB1100F has measurements of 125mm x 87mm x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") and a weight of 512 grams (1.13 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-70 versus Samsung WB1100F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the WG-70 compared to the WB1100F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-70 and WB1100F is 91 and 67 respectively.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB1100F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to envision the gap between sensor measurements only by reading specifications. The visual here should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-70 and WB1100F.
To sum up, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of images however you need to factor the age of the products into consideration. The younger WG-70 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB1100F Specifications
Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung WB1100F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung WB1100F |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2020-02-04 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
Flash settings | On, off | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) | 512 gr (1.13 lbs) |
Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 125 x 87 x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $280 | $250 |