Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB2200F
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5df4a/5df4a7bd7b9b88dd2f51805c9d7765d7c23b749f" alt="Ricoh WG-70 front Ricoh WG-70 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba44a/ba44a222150612400a1bd4c12a80aaa4b3435771" alt="Samsung WB2200F front Samsung WB2200F front"
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced February 2020
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Revealed January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung WB2200F, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-70 (16MP) and the WB2200F (16MP) is fairly close and both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The WG-70 was unveiled 6 years later than the WB2200F and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the WG-70 matches up versus the WB2200F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-70 & Samsung WB2200F. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery & Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Samsung WB2200F
WG-70 | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2020 | ![]() | January 2014 | More recent by 74 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Ricoh WG-70
WB2200F | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung WB2200F
WG-70 | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch display |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-70 offers physical dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Samsung WB2200F has proportions of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-70 and Samsung WB2200F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view size comparison of the WG-70 versus the WB2200F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18c24/18c243decc3c082552eec24b14ac220082a769ea" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB2200F size comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB2200F size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-70 and WB2200F is 91 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3ba7/c3ba780ec412f88668077ba3b7dd9b17fe772950" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB2200F top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB2200F top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements just by looking through technical specs. The photograph underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-70 and WB2200F.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the identical megapixels and you can expect comparable quality of photographs although you should really factor the age of the cameras into account. The more modern WG-70 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab8f0/ab8f0e84a2980d274bc743780f6d3a72111ecf5c" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB2200F sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB2200F sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46570/46570adf26c5a48fe40d1ffe3805b4708bbcd57f" alt="Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh WG-70 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung WB2200F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-70 | Samsung WB2200F |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2020-02-04 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dots |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1/8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
Flash options | On, off | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) | 708 grams (1.56 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | BP-1410 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $280 | $599 |