Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma SD9
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched February 2020
- Updated by Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Released November 2002
- Successor is Sigma SD10
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Ricoh WG-70 and Sigma SD9, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Ricoh and Sigma. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the WG-70 (16MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the WG-70 (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) have different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WG-70 was released 17 years after the SD9 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the WG-70 scores against the SD9 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-70 & Sigma SD9. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery & Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Sigma SD9
| WG-70 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2020 |  | November 2002 | More modern by 210 months |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+0.9") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 130k | Sharper screen (+100k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Ricoh WG-70
| SD9 | WG-70 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Sigma SD9
| WG-70 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-70 offers external dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sigma SD9 has specifications of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") and a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-70 and Sigma SD9 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the WG-70 vs the SD9.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-70 and SD9 is 91 and 54 respectively.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes purely by checking a spec sheet. The image here may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-70 and SD9.
As you can see, each of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The WG-70 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Ricoh WG-70 will give greater detail as a result of its extra 13MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more recent WG-70 should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-70 | Sigma SD9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Sigma |
| Model | Ricoh WG-70 | Sigma SD9 |
| Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Launched | 2020-02-04 | 2002-11-26 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 1.8" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 130 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/6000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | On, off | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) | 950 grams (2.09 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $280 | $3,001 |
