Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony HX99
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
91 Imaging
44 Features
67 Overall
53
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony HX99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced February 2020
- New Model is Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3-inch Sensor
- 3.00" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 242g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Released September 2018
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony HX99 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Ricoh WG-70 and Sony HX99, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the WG-70 (16MP) and the HX99 (18MP) is very comparable but the WG-70 (1/2.3") and HX99 (1/2.3-inch) boast different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-70 was released 18 months later than the HX99 making them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the WG-70 grades vs the HX99 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony HX99 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-70 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery & Sony HX99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Sony HX99
| WG-70 | HX99 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2020 | September 2018 | More recent by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Sony HX99 over the Ricoh WG-70
| HX99 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimensions | 3.00" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Sony HX99
| WG-70 | HX99 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focusing |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony HX99 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-70 offers physical measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Sony HX99 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") and a weight of 242 grams (0.53 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-70 and Sony HX99 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the WG-70 compared to the HX99.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-70 and HX99 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony HX99 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to imagine the gap in sensor measurements merely by checking out specifications. The graphic below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-70 and HX99.
To sum up, both of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WG-70 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Sony HX99 will produce extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The younger WG-70 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony HX99 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sony HX99 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-70 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-70 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2020-02-04 | 2018-09-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3-inch |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.5-6.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3.00 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 638 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.5x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | On, off | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 193g (0.43 lb) | 242g (0.53 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | 360 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $280 | $469 |