Ricoh WG-70 vs YI M1
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
87 Imaging
58 Features
66 Overall
61
Ricoh WG-70 vs YI M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released February 2020
- Updated by Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 350g - 114 x 64 x 34mm
- Released September 2016
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-70 vs YI M1 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Ricoh WG-70 vs YI M1, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and YI. The sensor resolution of the WG-70 (16MP) and the M1 (20MP) is fairly close but the WG-70 (1/2.3") and M1 (Four Thirds) boast totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-70 was released 3 years later than the M1 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera and the YI M1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the WG-70 grades versus the M1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-70 vs YI M1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-70 & YI M1. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery & YI M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the YI M1
| WG-70 | M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2020 | September 2016 | More recent by 42 months |
Reasons to pick YI M1 over the Ricoh WG-70
| M1 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and YI M1
| WG-70 | M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-70 vs YI M1 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-70 offers outer dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the YI M1 has dimensions of 114mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 350 grams (0.77 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-70 vs YI M1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the WG-70 compared to the M1.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the WG-70 and M1 is 91 and 87 respectively.
Ricoh WG-70 vs YI M1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements purely by looking through a spec sheet. The visual below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-70 and M1.
As you can see, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The WG-70 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field harder and the YI M1 will result in greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The fresher WG-70 is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-70 vs YI M1 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh WG-70 vs YI M1 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-70 | YI M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | YI |
| Model | Ricoh WG-70 | YI M1 |
| Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2020-02-04 | 2016-09-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 81 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 107 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Red-Eye Slow |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 75 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 193 grams (0.43 lb) | 350 grams (0.77 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 114 x 64 x 34mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | 450 photographs |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $280 | $320 |