Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung HZ25W
91 Imaging
43 Features
35 Overall
39
70 Imaging
34 Features
32 Overall
33
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2022
- Previous Model is Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Additionally referred to as WB5000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung HZ25W Overview
Below, we are comparing the Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung HZ25W, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-80 (16MP) and HZ25W (12MP) but they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WG-80 was introduced 12 years after the HZ25W which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the WG-80 matches up against the HZ25W for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung HZ25W Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-80 & Samsung HZ25W. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh WG-80 Gallery & Samsung HZ25W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Samsung HZ25W
| WG-80 | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2022 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 145 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Ricoh WG-80
| HZ25W | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.70" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-80 and Samsung HZ25W
| WG-80 | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-80 has got external dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung HZ25W has proportions of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") having a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung HZ25W in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the WG-80 vs the HZ25W.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-80 and HZ25W is 91 and 70 respectively.
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizes simply by seeing a spec sheet. The pic here should give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-80 and HZ25W.
As you can see, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-80 to show more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more recent WG-80 should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications
| Ricoh WG-80 | Samsung HZ25W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-80 | Samsung HZ25W |
| Also referred to as | - | WB5000 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2022-05-19 | 2010-07-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.70" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.60 m |
| Flash options | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 193g (0.43 lbs) | 428g (0.94 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $300 | $350 |