Clicky

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung HZ35W

Portability
91
Imaging
43
Features
35
Overall
39
Ricoh WG-80 front
 
Samsung HZ35W front
Portability
91
Imaging
34
Features
42
Overall
37

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs

Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.70" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Released May 2022
  • Previous Model is Ricoh WG-70
Samsung HZ35W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
  • Announced June 2010
  • Alternate Name is WB650
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview

Below, we will be evaluating the Ricoh WG-80 versus Samsung HZ35W, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the WG-80 (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) but they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The WG-80 was launched 12 years after the HZ35W which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the WG-80 scores vs the HZ35W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Samsung HZ35W

 WG-80 HZ35W 
AnnouncedMay 2022June 2010More modern by 146 months

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Ricoh WG-80

 HZ35W WG-80 
Screen dimension3"2.70"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution614k230kClearer screen (+384k dot)

Common features in the Ricoh WG-80 and Samsung HZ35W

 WG-80 HZ35W 
Manual focus Dial exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen No Touch screen

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-80 provides external measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Check out the Ricoh WG-80 versus Samsung HZ35W in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the WG-80 vs the HZ35W.

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung HZ35W size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-80 and HZ35W is 91 and 91 respectively.

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung HZ35W top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes merely by researching technical specs. The image below will provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-80 and HZ35W.

As you can tell, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should expect the Ricoh WG-80 to result in more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more recent WG-80 provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung HZ35W sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-80 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung HZ35W Portrait photography highlights
42
focusing manually
MP count good (16 megapixels)
features face detect autofocus
no manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
33
has manual focus
comes with face detection focus
no external flash support
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-80 Street photography features
Samsung HZ35W Street photography features
55
weather proofing
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
60
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (245g)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-80 Sports photography info
Samsung HZ35W Sports photography info
42
MP count good (16MP)
features tracking focus
weather proofing
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
42
long zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with tracking autofocus
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh WG-80
Travel photography with Samsung HZ35W
71
weather proofing
MP count good (16MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
63
lighter than competition in class (245g)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
very long zoom (360mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.2)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-80 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung HZ35W as a Landscape photography camera
44
focusing manually
quite wide (28mm)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
weather proofing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.70")
no manual mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
42
has manual focus
really wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh WG-80
Vlogging with Samsung HZ35W
31
quite wide (28mm)
features face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
missing microphone port
31
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focus
lighter than competition in class (245 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-80 and Samsung HZ35W
 Ricoh WG-80Samsung HZ35W
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh WG-80 Samsung HZ35W
Also Known as - WB650
Category Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2022-05-19 2010-06-16
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Min native ISO 125 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 24-360mm (15.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.5-5.5 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focus distance 1cm 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.70 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 614 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 16 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) 5.00 m
Flash settings On, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 193g (0.43 pounds) 245g (0.54 pounds)
Dimensions 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photographs -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model D-LI92 SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $300 $300