Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung HZ35W
91 Imaging
43 Features
35 Overall
39
91 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2022
- Previous Model is Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
- Alternate Name is WB650
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Ricoh WG-80 versus Samsung HZ35W, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the WG-80 (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) but they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe WG-80 was launched 12 years after the HZ35W which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the WG-80 scores vs the HZ35W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-80 and Samsung HZ35W. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-80 Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Samsung HZ35W
| WG-80 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2022 | June 2010 | More modern by 146 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Ricoh WG-80
| HZ35W | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.70" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 614k | 230k | Clearer screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-80 and Samsung HZ35W
| WG-80 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-80 provides external measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-80 versus Samsung HZ35W in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the WG-80 vs the HZ35W.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-80 and HZ35W is 91 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes merely by researching technical specs. The image below will provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-80 and HZ35W.
As you can tell, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should expect the Ricoh WG-80 to result in more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more recent WG-80 provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Ricoh WG-80 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-80 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also Known as | - | WB650 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2022-05-19 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.70 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 193g (0.43 pounds) | 245g (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $300 |