Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung PL200
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
94 Imaging
36 Features
22 Overall
30
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2022
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Released July 2010
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung PL200 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Ricoh WG-80 versus Samsung PL200, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-80 (16MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is fairly close and they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-80 was manufactured 12 years later than the PL200 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summation of how the WG-80 matches up versus the PL200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-80 and Samsung PL200. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-80 Gallery and Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Samsung PL200
| WG-80 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2022 |  | July 2010 | Fresher by 144 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Ricoh WG-80
| PL200 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.70" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-80 and Samsung PL200
| WG-80 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-80 has exterior dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Samsung PL200 has sizing of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-80 versus Samsung PL200 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the WG-80 compared to the PL200.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-80 and PL200 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizing purely by viewing specifications. The photograph underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-80 and PL200.
To sum up, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-80 to render extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The newer WG-80 provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-80 | Samsung PL200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-80 | Samsung PL200 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2022-05-19 | 2010-07-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.70 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 193 gr (0.43 lb) | 170 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $300 | $0 |