Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung TL100
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
91 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung TL100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched May 2022
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 219g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Additionally Known as ST50
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung TL100 Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Ricoh WG-80 versus Samsung TL100, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the WG-80 (16MP) and TL100 (12MP) but they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-80 was revealed 13 years later than the TL100 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the WG-80 matches up vs the TL100 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung TL100 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-80 & Samsung TL100. The full galleries are available at Ricoh WG-80 Gallery & Samsung TL100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Samsung TL100
| WG-80 | TL100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2022 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 163 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL100 over the Ricoh WG-80
| TL100 | WG-80 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-80 and Samsung TL100
| WG-80 | TL100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 2.70" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung TL100 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera often, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-80 has physical measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung TL100 has sizing of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 219 grams (0.48 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-80 versus Samsung TL100 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the WG-80 and the TL100.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-80 and TL100 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung TL100 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualise the difference between sensor measurements purely by reading specs. The visual below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-80 and TL100.
All in all, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-80 to deliver extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more recent WG-80 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung TL100 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Ricoh WG-80 vs Samsung TL100 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-80 | Samsung TL100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-80 | Samsung TL100 |
| Alternative name | - | ST50 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2022-05-19 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.0-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.70 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | On, off | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 800 x 592 (20 fps) , 640 x 480 (30,15 fps) , 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 193g (0.43 pounds) | 219g (0.48 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $22 |