Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ25W
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Launched July 2010
- Also referred to as WB5000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ25W Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung HZ25W, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the HZ25W (12MP) is fairly close and both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe WG-M1 was brought out 4 years after the HZ25W which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the WG-M1 grades versus the HZ25W with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ25W Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung HZ25W. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Samsung HZ25W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung HZ25W
| WG-M1 | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 51 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Ricoh WG-M1
| HZ25W | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung HZ25W
| WG-M1 | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-M1 features exterior measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ25W has specifications of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung HZ25W in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the WG-M1 vs the HZ25W.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-M1 and HZ25W is 91 and 70 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes just by researching specs. The picture below might provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-M1 and HZ25W.
All in all, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-M1 to result in more detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The younger WG-M1 provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung HZ25W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung HZ25W |
| Also referred to as | - | WB5000 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2014-09-12 | 2010-07-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 1.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 115k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | - | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.60 m |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190g (0.42 lb) | 428g (0.94 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $2,000 | $350 |