Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX500
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62a6a/62a6a983a6af3568f6b39137b109a895b4f78a46" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 front Ricoh WG-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26ad4/26ad408e09a190dab4a1204a32d9674f2ed6ea5e" alt="Samsung NX500 front Samsung NX500 front"
87 Imaging
67 Features
80 Overall
72
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
(Full Review)
- 28MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Expand to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 287g - 120 x 64 x 43mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Earlier Model is Samsung NX300
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX500 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung NX500, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and NX500 (28MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and NX500 (APS-C) use totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The WG-M1 was launched 4 months before the NX500 so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX500 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief view of how the WG-M1 grades versus the NX500 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX500 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung NX500. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung NX500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung NX500
WG-M1 | NX500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX500 over the Ricoh WG-M1
NX500 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
Screen resolution | 1036k | ![]() | 115k | Sharper screen (+921k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung NX500
WG-M1 | NX500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2014 | ![]() | February 2015 | Similar age |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX500 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-M1 features outer dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX500 has sizing of 120mm x 64mm x 43mm (4.7" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 287 grams (0.63 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung NX500 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the WG-M1 and the NX500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11c35/11c351f7b0636e462d52a3f9cee0ece5b17c82ca" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX500 size comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX500 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and NX500 is 91 and 87 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44a16/44a167ab1fad175fd08f538e6b96ccc495786db3" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX500 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX500 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX500 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to see the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading specifications. The graphic below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-M1 and NX500.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WG-M1 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh trickier and the Samsung NX500 will offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 14 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3abe0/3abe00144879da98c1340971cb85b26ceb426cc8" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX500 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX500 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68491/68491a7d39c73d5ab7d43b113aabddc884f8e48f" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX500 Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung NX500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung NX500 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2014-09-12 | 2015-02-06 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | DRIMe 5 |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 28MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 6480 x 4320 |
Highest native ISO | 800 | 25600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 209 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | (1×) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Total lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 1.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 115k dot | 1,036k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | - | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/6000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 9.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Smart flash, auto, auto w/redeye reduction, fill flash, fill w/redeye reduction, 1st-curtain, 2nd-curtain, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 4096 x 2160 (24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.265 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) | 287 gr (0.63 pounds) |
Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 120 x 64 x 43mm (4.7" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 87 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.9 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1379 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 370 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-65 | BP1130 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 - 30 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $2,000 | $800 |