Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL620
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Other Name is PL65
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL620 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung SL620, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the SL620 (12MP) is pretty close and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-M1 was announced 5 years after the SL620 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the WG-M1 scores against the SL620 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung SL620. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung SL620
| WG-M1 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 68 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| SL620 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung SL620
| WG-M1 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-M1 provides exterior dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung SL620 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung SL620 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-M1 versus the SL620.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-M1 and SL620 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions only by viewing specifications. The pic here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-M1 and SL620.
Plainly, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh WG-M1 to provide you with more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The younger WG-M1 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung SL620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung SL620 |
| Also called | - | PL65 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2014-09-12 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 800 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 1.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | - | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lb) | 168 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $2,000 | $200 |