Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL620
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
94 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Other Name is PL65
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL620 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung SL620, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the SL620 (12MP) is pretty close and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-M1 was announced 5 years after the SL620 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the WG-M1 scores against the SL620 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung SL620. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung SL620
| WG-M1 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 68 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| SL620 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung SL620
| WG-M1 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-M1 provides exterior dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung SL620 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung SL620 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-M1 versus the SL620.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-M1 and SL620 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions only by viewing specifications. The pic here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-M1 and SL620.
Plainly, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh WG-M1 to provide you with more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The younger WG-M1 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung SL620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung SL620 |
| Also called | - | PL65 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2014-09-12 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 800 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 1.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | - | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lb) | 168 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $2,000 | $200 |
