Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL820
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL820 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 168g - 95 x 59 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Additionally Known as IT100
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL820 Overview
Below is a in depth assessment of the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL820, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the SL820 (12MP) is relatively similar and they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-M1 was released 5 years later than the SL820 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the WG-M1 matches up against the SL820 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL820 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung SL820. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung SL820 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung SL820
| WG-M1 | SL820 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 68 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL820 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| SL820 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung SL820
| WG-M1 | SL820 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL820 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-M1 enjoys outside dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL820 has measurements of 95mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL820 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the WG-M1 vs the SL820.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-M1 and SL820 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL820 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements merely by going over specifications. The graphic below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-M1 and SL820.
To sum up, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-M1 to offer you more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The newer WG-M1 will have a benefit in sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL820 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL820 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung SL820 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung SL820 |
| Otherwise known as | - | IT100 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2014-09-12 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 800 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.4-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 1.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 115 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | - | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | - | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.50 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lb) | 168 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 95 x 59 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $2,000 | $280 |
