Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST100
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.6-4.8) lens
- 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST100 Overview
The following is a comprehensive comparison of the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung ST100, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the ST100 (14MP) is relatively close and both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-M1 was revealed 4 years after the ST100 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST100 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the WG-M1 scores against the ST100 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST100 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung ST100. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung ST100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung ST100
| WG-M1 | ST100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 57 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST100 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| ST100 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+2") |
| Screen resolution | 1152k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+1037k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung ST100
| WG-M1 | ST100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST100 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-M1 offers exterior measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST100 has specifications of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung ST100 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the WG-M1 vs the ST100.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-M1 and ST100 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST100 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions just by viewing technical specs. The picture underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-M1 and ST100.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of images although you will want to consider the age of the cameras into account. The more recent WG-M1 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST100 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung ST100 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung ST100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung ST100 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2014-09-12 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.6-4.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 1.5 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 115 thousand dot | 1,152 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | - | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/1000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.10 m |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lb) | 155 gr (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $2,000 | $250 |