Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL350
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Alternate Name is WB2000
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung TL350, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and TL350 (10MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-M1 was manufactured 4 years after the TL350 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the WG-M1 matches up versus the TL350 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung TL350. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung TL350
| WG-M1 | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 |  | February 2010 | Newer by 56 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| TL350 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+805k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung TL350
| WG-M1 | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera often, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-M1 enjoys outside measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung TL350 has dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung TL350 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is the front view size comparison of the WG-M1 and the TL350.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-M1 and TL350 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specifications. The image here may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-M1 and TL350.
To sum up, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-M1 to give extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more recent WG-M1 provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung TL350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung TL350 |
| Also called as | - | WB2000 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2014-09-12 | 2010-02-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.4-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 1.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 115k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | - | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | - | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.20 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) | 195 gr (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | - | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $2,000 | $400 |