Clicky

Sony T900 vs Sony W320

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
30
Overall
33
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front
Portability
97
Imaging
37
Features
21
Overall
30

Sony T900 vs Sony W320 Key Specs

Sony T900
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
  • 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
  • Launched February 2009
Sony W320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
  • Revealed January 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sony T900 vs Sony W320 Overview

Below, we are analyzing the Sony T900 and Sony W320, both Ultracompact cameras and they are both sold by Sony. The image resolution of the T900 (12MP) and the W320 (14MP) is fairly comparable and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The T900 was released 10 months prior to the W320 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summary of how the T900 matches up vs the W320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Sony W320

 T900 W320 
Focus manually More exact focusing
Display dimension3.5"2.7"Larger display (+0.8")
Display resolution922k230kSharper display (+692k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Sony T900

 W320 T900 
RevealedJanuary 2010February 2009More recent by 10 months

Common features in the Sony T900 and Sony W320

 T900 W320 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Sony T900 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Sony T900 comes with outside measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Sony W320 has dimensions of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") and a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

Look at the Sony T900 and Sony W320 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the T900 against the W320.

Sony T900 vs Sony W320 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the T900 and W320 is 96 and 97 respectively.

Sony T900 vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison

Sony T900 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements just by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the T900 and W320.

As you can see, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You should anticipate the Sony W320 to provide greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older T900 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Sony T900 vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison

Sony T900 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder

Sony T900 vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sony T900 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony W320 as a Portrait photography camera
27
you can focus manually
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
28
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Sony T900 Street photography highlights
Sony W320 Street photography highlights
57
image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
49
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Sony T900
Sports photography with Sony W320
24
image stabilization (Optical)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,000s)
max fps very slow (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
26
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Sony T900 as a Travel photography camera
Sony W320 as a Travel photography camera
52
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse mode
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
66
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (26mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.7)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Landscape Comparison

Sony T900 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony W320 as a Landscape photography camera
37
you can focus manually
lovely big screen (3.5 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not available
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
33
rather wide (26mm)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.7)
small screen (2.7 inches)
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segments

Vlogging Comparison

Sony T900 as a Vlogging camera
Sony W320 as a Vlogging camera
28
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone socket
26
rather wide (26mm)
slow max aperture (f2.7)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have external microphone socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sony T900 vs Sony W320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sony T900 and Sony W320
 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
General Information
Brand Sony Sony
Model type Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Launched 2009-02-17 2010-01-07
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 4320 x 3240
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35-140mm (4.0x) 26-105mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-10.0 f/2.7-5.7
Macro focusing distance - 4cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3.5" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 922 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 2 seconds 1 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 2.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 2.90 m (Auto ISO) 4.80 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 143 gr (0.32 pounds) 117 gr (0.26 pounds)
Dimensions 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch pricing $300 $269