Clicky

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB700

Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
22
Overall
32
Ricoh WG-M1 front
 
Samsung WB700 front
Portability
98
Imaging
37
Features
21
Overall
30

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs

Ricoh WG-M1
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 1.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
  • 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
  • Announced September 2014
Samsung WB700
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
  • Announced December 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB700 Overview

In this write-up, we will be comparing the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung WB700, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is relatively similar and they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The WG-M1 was manufactured 3 years after the WB700 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the WG-M1 scores vs the WB700 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung WB700

 WG-M1 WB700 
AnnouncedSeptember 2014December 2010Newer by 46 months

Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Ricoh WG-M1

 WB700 WG-M1 
Screen sizing3"1.5"Bigger screen (+1.5")
Screen resolution614k115kCrisper screen (+499k dot)

Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung WB700

 WG-M1 WB700 
Manually focus No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-M1 has got outside measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung WB700 has dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Check the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung WB700 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the WG-M1 against the WB700.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB700 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-M1 and WB700 is 91 and 98 respectively.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB700 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions simply by going over specs. The image underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and WB700.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact megapixels and you can expect similar quality of files however you should factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The newer WG-M1 will have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB700 sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh WG-M1
Portrait photography with Samsung WB700
30
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
30
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 Street photography highlights
Samsung WB700 Street photography highlights
53
weather sealing
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
low max ISO (800)
49
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
max ISO too low (0)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh WG-M1
Sports photography with Samsung WB700
38
MP count decent (14MP)
weather sealing
great battery pack (350 CIPA)
fixed focal length ((1×)mm)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
28
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
fixed focal length (()mm)
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 Travel photography highlights
Samsung WB700 Travel photography highlights
64
great battery pack (350 CIPA)
weather sealing
MP count decent (14MP)
missing Timelapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
70
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
good max aperture (f)
missing Time Lapse recording
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh WG-M1
Landscape photography with Samsung WB700
35
MP count decent (14MP)
weather sealing
great battery pack (350 shots)
lack of manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length ((1×)mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
small screen (1.5 inches)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
low max ISO (800)
does not have RAW files
missing Timelapse mode
38
good max aperture (f)
screen size is good (3 inches)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (()mm)
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (0)
has no RAW format
missing Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 Vlogging features
Samsung WB700 Vlogging features
26
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
missing external microphone port
27
good max aperture (f)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing mic jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung WB700 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung WB700
 Ricoh WG-M1Samsung WB700
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh WG-M1 Samsung WB700
Category Waterproof Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2014-09-12 2010-12-28
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 4320 x 3240 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 800 -
Minimum native ISO 100 -
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range (1×) ()
Largest aperture f/2.8 -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 1.5 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 115k dot 614k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed - 30s
Maximum shutter speed - 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 10.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash -
Flash settings no built-in flash -
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format H.264 H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 190 grams (0.42 lbs) -
Dimensions 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photos -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID DB-65 -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage microSD/microSDHC, internal -
Storage slots One One
Launch price $2,000 $300