Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A9 II
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31


62 Imaging
75 Features
93 Overall
82
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A9 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Boost to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 678g - 129 x 96 x 76mm
- Announced October 2019
- Replaced the Sony A9

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A9 II Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sony A9 II, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and A9 II (24MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and A9 II (Full frame) posses totally different sensor sizes.

The WG-M1 was announced 6 years before the A9 II and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony A9 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a short summation of how the WG-M1 grades vs the A9 II with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A9 II Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony Alpha A9 Mark II. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Sony A9 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony A9 II
WG-M1 | A9 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A9 II over the Ricoh WG-M1
A9 II | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2019 | ![]() | September 2014 | More recent by 61 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
Screen resolution | 1440k | ![]() | 115k | Sharper screen (+1325k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony A9 II
WG-M1 | A9 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A9 II Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-M1 offers outside measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sony A9 II has sizing of 129mm x 96mm x 76mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 678 grams (1.49 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sony A9 II in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-M1 and the A9 II.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and A9 II is 91 and 62 respectively.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A9 II Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements just by reading a spec sheet. The graphic below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and A9 II.
As you can see, both of those cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The WG-M1 with its tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh more difficult and the Sony A9 II will offer you extra detail with its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The older WG-M1 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A9 II Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A9 II Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha A9 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha A9 Mark II |
Category | Waterproof | Pro Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2014-09-12 | 2019-10-03 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 847.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 800 | 51200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 204800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 693 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | (1×) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 1.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 115 thousand dot | 1,440 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,686 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | - | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | - | 1/8000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 20.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 lb) | 678g (1.49 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 129 x 96 x 76mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 690 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-65 | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs + continuous, 3 or 5 frames) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II compatible) |
Storage slots | Single | Dual |
Price at launch | $2,000 | $4,498 |