Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FP8
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1838c/1838cdf26d1a273bfc0958872d51c3945bf812d1" alt="Olympus E-3 front Olympus E-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10548/105481727825cb9cec94d025b6a727750d258e12" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 front"
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FP8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Revealed February 2008
- Previous Model is Olympus E-1
- Newer Model is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 151g - 96 x 60 x 20mm
- Introduced July 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FP8 Overview
The following is a extensive assessment of the Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FP8, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the FP8 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and FP8 (1/2.3") come with different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-3 was launched 17 months earlier than the FP8 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FP8 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-3 scores versus the FP8 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FP8 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-3 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Panasonic FP8 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Panasonic FP8
E-3 | FP8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP8 over the Olympus E-3
FP8 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2009 | ![]() | February 2008 | Newer by 17 months |
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic FP8
E-3 | FP8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same display resolution |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FP8 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-3 offers external dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) and the Panasonic FP8 has sizing of 96mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FP8 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-3 versus the FP8.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3af28/3af288cd0e1f48a35d20f5131f5508d4f230c567" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FP8 size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FP8 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-3 and FP8 is 56 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7485b/7485bb9a465aa3baae8b75dfc80cec98a2867fe7" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FP8 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FP8 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FP8 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading through a spec sheet. The pic underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-3 and FP8.
Clearly, each of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-3 featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic FP8 will give greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged E-3 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d7d9/8d7d93dbef4ce018ba9d43938d3460082a1158e4" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FP8 sensor size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FP8 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FP8 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eef13/eef13af7cda797b5d22950268293417060356970" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FP8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FP8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FP8 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2008-02-20 | 2009-07-27 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-128mm (4.6x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1300 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 5.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890 gr (1.96 pounds) | 151 gr (0.33 pounds) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 96 x 60 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $670 | $300 |