Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A330
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
67 Imaging
49 Features
50 Overall
49
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 529g - 128 x 97 x 71mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Earlier Model is Sony A300
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A330 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A330, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and A330 (10MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and A330 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-M1 was announced 5 years later than the A330 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony A330 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the WG-M1 scores against the A330 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A330 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A330. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Sony A330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony A330
| WG-M1 | A330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 |  | May 2009 | More recent by 65 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A330 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| A330 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony A330
| WG-M1 | A330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A330 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-M1 provides physical dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Sony A330 has proportions of 128mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") and a weight of 529 grams (1.17 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A330 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the WG-M1 compared to the A330.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and A330 is 91 and 67 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A330 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to visualize the difference in sensor measurements purely by researching technical specs. The visual below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-M1 and A330.
As you can tell, both cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The WG-M1 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh harder and the Ricoh WG-M1 will provide you with more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more modern WG-M1 provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A330 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A330 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 |
| Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2014-09-12 | 2009-05-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | - |
| Available lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 1.5" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 115k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | - | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | - | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.00 m |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) | 529 grams (1.17 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 128 x 97 x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 535 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | 230 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | DB-65 | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $2,000 | $545 |