Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX300
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Announced February 2013
- Previous Model is Sony HX200V
- Replacement is Sony HX400V
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX300 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX300, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Sony. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and HX300 (20MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-M1 was unveiled 19 months after the HX300 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the WG-M1 scores versus the HX300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX300 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony HX300
| WG-M1 | HX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | February 2013 | Newer by 19 months |
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| HX300 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+806k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony HX300
| WG-M1 | HX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera often, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-M1 has physical measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sony HX300 has measurements of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") having a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX300 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the WG-M1 vs the HX300.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and HX300 is 91 and 63 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to see the difference in sensor dimensions merely by viewing technical specs. The picture underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-M1 and HX300.
As you have seen, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Sony HX300 to render greater detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The more modern WG-M1 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX300 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2014-09-12 | 2013-02-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 800 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 1.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 115k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | - | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190g (0.42 pounds) | 623g (1.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | microSD/microSDHC, internal | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $2,000 | $339 |