Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX1
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 142g - 94 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced August 2009
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX1 Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX1, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Sony. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and TX1 (10MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and TX1 (1/2.4") use different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WG-M1 was manufactured 5 years later than the TX1 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a short summation of how the WG-M1 scores against the TX1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Sony TX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony TX1
WG-M1 | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2014 | August 2009 | More recent by 63 months |
Reasons to pick Sony TX1 over the Ricoh WG-M1
TX1 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 115k | Sharper display (+115k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony TX1
WG-M1 | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-M1 enjoys exterior measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Sony TX1 has proportions of 94mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the WG-M1 versus the TX1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-M1 and TX1 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements just by going through technical specs. The graphic below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-M1 and TX1.
As you have seen, the two cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The WG-M1 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Ricoh WG-M1 will provide extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The younger WG-M1 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX1 Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 |
Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2014-09-12 | 2009-08-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | (1×) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 8cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 1.5 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 115 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | - | 2 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/1250 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 lbs) | 142g (0.31 lbs) |
Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 94 x 58 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-65 | - |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $2,000 | $350 |