Samsung CL80 vs Sigma SD14
95 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
59 Imaging
42 Features
30 Overall
37
Samsung CL80 vs Sigma SD14 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
- Alternative Name is ST5500
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 750g - 144 x 107 x 81mm
- Released September 2006
- Previous Model is Sigma SD10
- New Model is Sigma SD15
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung CL80 vs Sigma SD14 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Samsung CL80 and Sigma SD14, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by brands Samsung and Sigma. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the CL80 (14MP) and SD14 (5MP) and the CL80 (1/2.3") and SD14 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe CL80 was released 3 years after the SD14 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung CL80 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma SD14 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a short introduction of how the CL80 scores vs the SD14 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung CL80 vs Sigma SD14 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung CL80 & Sigma SD14. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung CL80 Gallery & Sigma SD14 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Sigma SD14
| CL80 | SD14 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 |  | September 2006 | Newer by 40 months |
| Screen dimension | 3.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 150k | Sharper screen (+80k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD14 over the Samsung CL80
| SD14 | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing |
Common features in the Samsung CL80 and Sigma SD14
| CL80 | SD14 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Samsung CL80 vs Sigma SD14 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Samsung CL80 offers outside dimensions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Sigma SD14 has sizing of 144mm x 107mm x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 750 grams (1.65 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung CL80 and Sigma SD14 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the CL80 versus the SD14.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the CL80 and SD14 is 95 and 59 respectively.
Samsung CL80 vs Sigma SD14 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions just by checking out technical specs. The pic underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the CL80 and SD14.
As you have seen, both of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The CL80 due to its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Samsung CL80 will show more detail as a result of its extra 9MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more modern CL80 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Samsung CL80 vs Sigma SD14 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Samsung CL80 vs Sigma SD14 Specifications
| Samsung CL80 | Sigma SD14 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Sigma |
| Model type | Samsung CL80 | Sigma SD14 |
| Also called as | ST5500 | - |
| Type | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2010-01-06 | 2006-09-26 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 5 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4334 x 3256 | 2640 x 1760 |
| Max native ISO | 4800 | 800 |
| Max boosted ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 31-217mm (7.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.5 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.7" | 2.5" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 150 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.6x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160 gr (0.35 lb) | 750 gr (1.65 lb) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 144 x 107 x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | SLB-11A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $400 | $198 |