Clicky

Samsung GX-1S vs Sony T900

Portability
68
Imaging
44
Features
36
Overall
40
Samsung GX-1S front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front
Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
30
Overall
32

Samsung GX-1S vs Sony T900 Key Specs

Samsung GX-1S
(Full Review)
  • 6MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • No Video
  • Pentax KAF Mount
  • 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
  • Released January 2006
Sony T900
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
  • 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
  • Launched February 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Samsung GX-1S vs Sony T900 Overview

Let's examine more closely at the Samsung GX-1S vs Sony T900, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Samsung and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the GX-1S (6MP) and T900 (12MP) and the GX-1S (APS-C) and T900 (1/2.3") come with different sensor measurements.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The GX-1S was manufactured 4 years before the T900 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the GX-1S grades versus the T900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Sony T900

 GX-1S T900 

Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Samsung GX-1S

 T900 GX-1S 
LaunchedFebruary 2009January 2006Newer by 37 months
Screen sizing3.5"2.5"Bigger screen (+1")
Screen resolution922k210kSharper screen (+712k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Samsung GX-1S and Sony T900

 GX-1S T900 
Manually focus More precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Samsung GX-1S vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Samsung GX-1S offers physical measurements of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs) and the Sony T900 has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).

See the Samsung GX-1S vs Sony T900 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the GX-1S versus the T900.

Samsung GX-1S vs Sony T900 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GX-1S and T900 is 68 and 96 respectively.

Samsung GX-1S vs Sony T900 top view buttons comparison

Samsung GX-1S vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reading through a spec sheet. The image underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the GX-1S and T900.

As you can see, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GX-1S due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Sony T900 will give you more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged GX-1S is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Samsung GX-1S vs Sony T900 sensor size comparison

Samsung GX-1S vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung GX-1S vs Sony T900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung GX-1S Portrait photography information
Sony T900 Portrait photography information
50
manual focus
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
no liveview
megapixel count low (6 megapixels)
27
focusing manually
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Samsung GX-1S Street photography details
Sony T900 Street photography details
60
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than competition (605 grams)
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
57
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Samsung GX-1S
Sports photography with Sony T900
38
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
has phase detect auto focus
no liveview
low fps (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (6 megapixels)
24
built in image stabilization (Optical)
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,000s)
continuous shooting slow (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Samsung GX-1S as a Travel photography camera
Sony T900 as a Travel photography camera
52
lighter than competition (605g)
flash built-in
does not have Time Lapse mode
megapixel count low (6MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
51
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Samsung GX-1S Landscape photography highlights
Sony T900 Landscape photography highlights
46
manual focus
swap lenses (Pentax KAF mount)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (6 megapixels)
does not have Time Lapse mode
36
focusing manually
lovely big screen (3.5")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual exposure
sensor resolution low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung GX-1S Vlogging highlights
Sony T900 Vlogging highlights
9
no video recording
28
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of microphone port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Samsung GX-1S vs Sony T900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung GX-1S and Sony T900
 Samsung GX-1SSony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
General Information
Brand Name Samsung Sony
Model type Samsung GX-1S Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
Category Advanced DSLR Ultracompact
Released 2006-01-16 2009-02-17
Body design Mid-size SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 369.0mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 6 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3008 x 2008 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 11 9
Lens
Lens mount type Pentax KAF fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 35-140mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.5-10.0
Available lenses 151 -
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5" 3.5"
Resolution of screen 210 thousand dot 922 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.64x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 seconds 2 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 2.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 605g (1.33 lbs) 143g (0.32 lbs)
Dimensions 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID 4 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/MMC card Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $850 $300