Samsung GX-20 vs Samsung HZ50W
58 Imaging
53 Features
52 Overall
52
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5098/a50987fbe1d3aed59d1942e6a355078ee6cfb4f2" alt="Samsung GX-20 front Samsung GX-20 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4f52/d4f52e39beb092353224512dc646b19cc509cfae" alt="Samsung HZ50W front Samsung HZ50W front"
70 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Samsung GX-20 vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 800g - 142 x 101 x 72mm
- Launched January 2008
- Previous Model is Samsung GX-10
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Released May 2010
- Additionally referred to as WB5500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Samsung GX-20 vs Samsung HZ50W Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Samsung GX-20 and Samsung HZ50W, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both sold by Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GX-20 (15MP) and the HZ50W (14MP) is relatively similar but the GX-20 (APS-C) and HZ50W (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The GX-20 was announced 3 years earlier than the HZ50W which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung GX-20 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short view of how the GX-20 scores against the HZ50W with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Samsung GX-20 vs Samsung HZ50W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung GX-20 & Samsung HZ50W. The whole galleries are available at Samsung GX-20 Gallery & Samsung HZ50W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-20 over the Samsung HZ50W
GX-20 | HZ50W |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Samsung GX-20
HZ50W | GX-20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2010 | ![]() | January 2008 | Newer by 27 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Samsung GX-20 and Samsung HZ50W
GX-20 | HZ50W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch screen |
Samsung GX-20 vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Samsung GX-20 offers physical dimensions of 142mm x 101mm x 72mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") and a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs) and the Samsung HZ50W has specifications of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") and a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung GX-20 and Samsung HZ50W in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at the time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the GX-20 compared to the HZ50W.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0512/e051251dd00b4ce6749360823b532dca9a3a77e0" alt="Samsung GX-20 vs Samsung HZ50W size comparison Samsung GX-20 vs Samsung HZ50W size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the GX-20 and HZ50W is 58 and 70 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54ca4/54ca49828538757b1e2ff6e1109622a8986fe304" alt="Samsung GX-20 vs Samsung HZ50W top view buttons comparison Samsung GX-20 vs Samsung HZ50W top view buttons comparison"
Samsung GX-20 vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions just by going over technical specs. The picture underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the GX-20 and HZ50W.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GX-20 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Samsung GX-20 will offer you extra detail with its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged GX-20 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac155/ac1552f60b1372696da3631f09197f238a391108" alt="Samsung GX-20 vs Samsung HZ50W sensor size comparison Samsung GX-20 vs Samsung HZ50W sensor size comparison"
Samsung GX-20 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cb4d/3cb4d5c05c788bddd4ba33dd0d7312909bd92649" alt="Samsung GX-20 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung GX-20 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Samsung GX-20 vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications
Samsung GX-20 | Samsung HZ50W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Samsung |
Model | Samsung GX-20 | Samsung HZ50W |
Also called as | - | WB5500 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2008-01-24 | 2010-05-03 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.4 x 15.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 365.0mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 15MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4688 x 3120 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Pentax KAF2 | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
Available lenses | 151 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.64x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 16 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 800 grams (1.76 pounds) | 426 grams (0.94 pounds) |
Dimensions | 142 x 101 x 72mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 68 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 714 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $850 | $250 |