Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sigma Quattro
90 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 283g - 133 x 71 x 19mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sigma Quattro, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Samsung and Sigma. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the Galaxy Camera 2 (16MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the Galaxy Camera 2 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) boast totally different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Galaxy Camera 2 was brought out 3 years prior to the Quattro which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief summation of how the Galaxy Camera 2 grades vs the Quattro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 and Sigma sd Quattro. The entire galleries are available at Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Gallery and Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 over the Sigma Quattro
Galaxy Camera 2 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 4.8" | 3" | Larger display (+1.8") | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
Quattro | Galaxy Camera 2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2016 | January 2014 | More modern by 26 months | |
Display resolution | 1620k | 1037k | Sharper display (+583k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 and Sigma Quattro
Galaxy Camera 2 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 has outside measurements of 133mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.2" x 2.8" x 0.7") along with a weight of 283 grams (0.62 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro has specifications of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Check out the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sigma Quattro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the Galaxy Camera 2 versus the Quattro.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the Galaxy Camera 2 and Quattro is 90 and 63 respectively.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes merely by looking at specifications. The picture below should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Galaxy Camera 2 and Quattro.
Plainly, each of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Galaxy Camera 2 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Sigma Quattro will give you greater detail having its extra 13MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged Galaxy Camera 2 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sigma |
Model type | Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 | Sigma sd Quattro |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2014-01-02 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | 1.6GHz Quad-Core Exynos | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 29MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5424 x 3616 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 4.8 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037k dot | 1,620k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | HD Super Clear Touch Display | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 3.8 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.80 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, fill-in, slow sync, flash off, redeye fix | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | - |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 283 gr (0.62 lbs) | 625 gr (1.38 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 133 x 71 x 19mm (5.2" x 2.8" x 0.7") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 400 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Built-in | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5, or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $400 | $738 |