Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sigma Quattro H
90 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
78 Imaging
72 Features
59 Overall
66
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 283g - 133 x 71 x 19mm
- Released January 2014
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
Following is a extensive overview of the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 versus Sigma Quattro H, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Samsung and Sigma. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the Galaxy Camera 2 (16MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the Galaxy Camera 2 (1/2.3") and Quattro H (APS-H) offer different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe Galaxy Camera 2 was manufactured 3 years prior to the Quattro H which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the Galaxy Camera 2 scores vs the Quattro H with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 & Sigma sd Quattro H. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Gallery & Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 over the Sigma Quattro H
Galaxy Camera 2 | Quattro H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 4.8" | 3" | Larger display (+1.8") | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
Quattro H | Galaxy Camera 2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2016 | January 2014 | More modern by 26 months | |
Display resolution | 1620k | 1037k | Crisper display (+583k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 and Sigma Quattro H
Galaxy Camera 2 | Quattro H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 enjoys outer measurements of 133mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.2" x 2.8" x 0.7") having a weight of 283 grams (0.62 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro H has sizing of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 versus Sigma Quattro H in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at the time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the Galaxy Camera 2 against the Quattro H.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Galaxy Camera 2 and Quattro H is 90 and 78 respectively.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes only by reviewing technical specs. The image underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Galaxy Camera 2 and Quattro H.
As you have seen, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Galaxy Camera 2 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Sigma Quattro H will deliver more detail due to its extra 29 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The more aged Galaxy Camera 2 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sigma |
Model type | Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 | Sigma sd Quattro H |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2014-01-02 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | 1.6GHz Quad-Core Exynos | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-H |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 476.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 45 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6200 x 4152 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.4 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 4.8" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 1,620k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | HD Super Clear Touch Display | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 16 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 3.8 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.80 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, fill-in, slow sync, flash off, redeye fix | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | - |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 283 grams (0.62 lb) | - |
Physical dimensions | 133 x 71 x 19mm (5.2" x 2.8" x 0.7") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 400 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Built-in | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5, or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $400 | $1,134 |