Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony H200
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Introduced August 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Launched January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony H200 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony H200, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the Galaxy Camera 3G (16MP) and the H200 (20MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Galaxy Camera 3G was introduced 4 months before the H200 so they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G being a Compact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise view of how the Galaxy Camera 3G grades versus the H200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony H200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The whole galleries are viewable at Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery and Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G over the Sony H200
| Galaxy Camera 3G | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 4.8" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.8") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
| H200 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 0k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G and Sony H200
| Galaxy Camera 3G | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2012 |  | January 2013 | Similar generation |
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G enjoys external dimensions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") and a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs) whilst the Sony H200 has dimensions of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") having a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Compare the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony H200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the Galaxy Camera 3G compared to the H200.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Galaxy Camera 3G and H200 is 90 and 67 respectively.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading through technical specs. The image here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Galaxy Camera 3G and H200.
As you have seen, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Sony H200 to give extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony H200 Specifications
| Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2012-08-29 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | 1.4GHz Quad-Core | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | - | 5184 x 2920 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 23-481mm (20.9x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 20cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 4.8" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 0k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display | ClearPhoto LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.80 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 305 gr (0.67 lb) | 530 gr (1.17 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photos |
| Type of battery | - | AA |
| Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $606 | $250 |