Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony TX1
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony TX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Announced August 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 142g - 94 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched August 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony TX1 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G versus Sony TX1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Samsung and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the Galaxy Camera 3G (16MP) and TX1 (10MP) and the Galaxy Camera 3G (1/2.3") and TX1 (1/2.4") enjoy different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Galaxy Camera 3G was brought out 3 years after the TX1 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G being a Compact camera and the Sony TX1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the Galaxy Camera 3G matches up vs the TX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony TX1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery & Sony TX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G over the Sony TX1
| Galaxy Camera 3G | TX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2012 |  | August 2009 | Newer by 38 months |
| Screen sizing | 4.8" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.8") |
Reasons to pick Sony TX1 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
| TX1 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 0k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G and Sony TX1
| Galaxy Camera 3G | TX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony TX1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G features physical measurements of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") along with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs) while the Sony TX1 has sizing of 94mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Look at the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G versus Sony TX1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the Galaxy Camera 3G vs the TX1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Galaxy Camera 3G and TX1 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony TX1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions just by looking at specs. The image underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Galaxy Camera 3G and TX1.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Galaxy Camera 3G featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G will give greater detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The younger Galaxy Camera 3G provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony TX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony TX1 Specifications
| Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2012-08-29 | 2009-08-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | 1.4GHz Quad-Core | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | - | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 23-481mm (20.9x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 8cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 4.8 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 0k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | - | 2 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | - | 1/1250 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.00 m |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 305g (0.67 lb) | 142g (0.31 lb) |
| Dimensions | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") | 94 x 58 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $606 | $350 |