Samsung HZ10W vs Samsung WB35F
90 Imaging
33 Features
27 Overall
30
![Samsung HZ10W front Samsung HZ10W front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-HZ10W/Samsung-HZ10W-front.jpg)
![Samsung WB35F front Samsung WB35F front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-WB35F/Samsung-WB35F-front.jpg)
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Samsung HZ10W vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Released May 2009
- Alternative Name is WB500
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2014
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Samsung HZ10W vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Here is a complete analysis of the Samsung HZ10W versus Samsung WB35F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are sold by Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the HZ10W (10MP) and WB35F (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
The HZ10W was manufactured 5 years prior to the WB35F and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the HZ10W grades versus the WB35F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Samsung HZ10W vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung HZ10W and Samsung WB35F. The entire galleries are available at Samsung HZ10W Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Samsung WB35F
HZ10W | WB35F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Samsung HZ10W
WB35F | HZ10W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | ![]() | May 2009 | Fresher by 56 months |
Common features in the Samsung HZ10W and Samsung WB35F
HZ10W | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical display measurements |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Samsung HZ10W vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Samsung HZ10W comes with exterior dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs) while the Samsung WB35F has measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Samsung HZ10W versus Samsung WB35F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the HZ10W and the WB35F.
![Samsung HZ10W vs Samsung WB35F size comparison Samsung HZ10W vs Samsung WB35F size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-HZ10W-vs-Samsung-WB35F-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the HZ10W and WB35F is 90 and 93 respectively.
![Samsung HZ10W vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison Samsung HZ10W vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-HZ10W-vs-Samsung-WB35F-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Samsung HZ10W vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizing purely by researching a spec sheet. The graphic below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the HZ10W and WB35F.
Clearly, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You should anticipate the Samsung WB35F to render more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older HZ10W will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
![Samsung HZ10W vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison Samsung HZ10W vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Samsung-HZ10W-vs-Samsung-WB35F-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Samsung HZ10W vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
![Samsung HZ10W vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung HZ10W vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-HZ10W-vs-Samsung-WB35F-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Samsung HZ10W vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Samsung HZ10W | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Samsung |
Model | Samsung HZ10W | Samsung WB35F |
Also Known as | WB500 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-05-14 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2432 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 16s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 249 gr (0.55 pounds) | 194 gr (0.43 pounds) |
Dimensions | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $300 | $130 |