Clicky

Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma SD1 Merrill

Portability
90
Imaging
33
Features
27
Overall
30
Samsung HZ10W front
 
Sigma SD1 Merrill front
Portability
57
Imaging
56
Features
45
Overall
51

Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs

Samsung HZ10W
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
  • 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
  • Launched May 2009
  • Additionally referred to as WB500
Sigma SD1 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
  • Launched April 2012
  • Older Model is Sigma SD1
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview

Lets take a closer look at the Samsung HZ10W and Sigma SD1 Merrill, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Samsung and Sigma. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the HZ10W (10MP) and SD1 Merrill (15MP) and the HZ10W (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) posses different sensor measurements.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The HZ10W was revealed 3 years prior to the SD1 Merrill and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung HZ10W being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the HZ10W scores vs the SD1 Merrill in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Sigma SD1 Merrill

 HZ10W SD1 Merrill 

Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Samsung HZ10W

 SD1 Merrill HZ10W 
LaunchedApril 2012May 2009Fresher by 35 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Samsung HZ10W and Sigma SD1 Merrill

 HZ10W SD1 Merrill 
Focus manually Very exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch display Neither features Touch display

Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Samsung HZ10W enjoys physical dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs) and the Sigma SD1 Merrill has specifications of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") having a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).

Contrast the Samsung HZ10W and Sigma SD1 Merrill in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the HZ10W vs the SD1 Merrill.

Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the HZ10W and SD1 Merrill is 90 and 57 respectively.

Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, its tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizing purely by seeing specifications. The visual below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the HZ10W and SD1 Merrill.

To sum up, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The HZ10W using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will produce extra detail because of its extra 5MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older HZ10W will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison

Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung HZ10W Portrait photography details
Sigma SD1 Merrill Portrait photography details
31
has manual focus
features face detection autofocus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
65
manual focus
resolution is good (15MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW files
doesn't have liveview
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Samsung HZ10W Street photography highlights
Sigma SD1 Merrill Street photography highlights
52
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
more heavy than competition (249g)
57
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW files
environment proof
no moving screen
no image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Samsung HZ10W
Sports photography with Sigma SD1 Merrill
26
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
61
resolution is good (15MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
environment proof
sensor has phase detect auto focus
doesn't have liveview
no image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Samsung HZ10W Travel photography info
Sigma SD1 Merrill Travel photography info
54
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
missing Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition (249 grams)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.3)
54
environment proof
resolution is good (15MP)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
does not offer selfie friendly display
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Samsung HZ10W
Landscape photography with Sigma SD1 Merrill
35
has manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no manual mode
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Timelapse recording
63
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
resolution is good (15MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW files
environment proof
doesn't have liveview
no image stabilization
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung HZ10W Vlogging info
Sigma SD1 Merrill Vlogging info
28
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection autofocus
slow max aperture (f3.3)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone support
more heavy than competition (249 grams)
9
can't shoot video
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung HZ10W and Sigma SD1 Merrill
 Samsung HZ10WSigma SD1 Merrill
General Information
Company Samsung Sigma
Model Samsung HZ10W Sigma SD1 Merrill
Otherwise known as WB500 -
Type Small Sensor Compact Advanced DSLR
Launched 2009-05-14 2012-04-10
Physical type Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Dual True II
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 15MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Peak resolution 3648 x 2432 4800 x 3200
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens focal range 24-240mm (10.0x) -
Max aperture f/3.3-5.8 -
Macro focus distance 5cm -
Total lenses - 76
Focal length multiplier 5.9 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 96%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.64x
Features
Min shutter speed 16 seconds -
Max shutter speed 1/1500 seconds -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix no built-in flash
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1280x720 None
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 249 grams (0.55 lbs) 790 grams (1.74 lbs)
Physical dimensions 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible)
Card slots 1 1
Retail price $300 $2,339