Samsung HZ25W vs Sigma DP3 Merrill
70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Samsung HZ25W vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Also referred to as WB5000
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 75mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Released January 2013
- Earlier Model is Sigma DP2 Merrill
Samsung HZ25W vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Overview
Below is a thorough comparison of the Samsung HZ25W versus Sigma DP3 Merrill, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Samsung and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the HZ25W (12MP) and the DP3 Merrill (15MP) is relatively comparable but the HZ25W (1/2.3") and DP3 Merrill (APS-C) have totally different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe HZ25W was launched 3 years before the DP3 Merrill and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Samsung HZ25W being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP3 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the HZ25W scores vs the DP3 Merrill in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung HZ25W vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung HZ25W & Sigma DP3 Merrill. The complete galleries are available at Samsung HZ25W Gallery & Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Sigma DP3 Merrill
HZ25W | DP3 Merrill |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP3 Merrill over the Samsung HZ25W
DP3 Merrill | HZ25W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | July 2010 | More recent by 30 months | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung HZ25W and Sigma DP3 Merrill
HZ25W | DP3 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Samsung HZ25W vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Samsung HZ25W provides external dimensions of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") having a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP3 Merrill has specifications of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") and a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung HZ25W versus Sigma DP3 Merrill in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the HZ25W and the DP3 Merrill.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the HZ25W and DP3 Merrill is 70 and 83 respectively.
Samsung HZ25W vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements simply by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the HZ25W and DP3 Merrill.
As you can see, the two cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The HZ25W due to its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sigma DP3 Merrill will show more detail utilizing its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The older HZ25W will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung HZ25W vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung HZ25W vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Specifications
Samsung HZ25W | Sigma DP3 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung HZ25W | Sigma DP3 Merrill |
Also called as | WB5000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-07-06 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4704 x 3136 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-624mm (24.0x) | 75mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 16s | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.60 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 640 x 480 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 428 grams (0.94 lbs) | 330 grams (0.73 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SC/SDHC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $350 | $1,353 |