Samsung HZ25W vs Sony RX10 IV
70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62d54/62d540e477b2fc4e185bed99aff836ee8cf05e0d" alt="Samsung HZ25W front Samsung HZ25W front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e636d/e636d6d773338e71588b03217805acb83fb0b161" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV front"
52 Imaging
53 Features
82 Overall
64
Samsung HZ25W vs Sony RX10 IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Alternate Name is WB5000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1095g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Launched September 2017
- Older Model is Sony RX10 III
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Samsung HZ25W vs Sony RX10 IV Overview
In this article, we will be contrasting the Samsung HZ25W vs Sony RX10 IV, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by rivals Samsung and Sony. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the HZ25W (12MP) and RX10 IV (20MP) and the HZ25W (1/2.3") and RX10 IV (1") come with totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The HZ25W was revealed 8 years prior to the RX10 IV and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Samsung HZ25W being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 IV being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summation of how the HZ25W matches up vs the RX10 IV in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Samsung HZ25W vs Sony RX10 IV Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung HZ25W & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV. The full galleries are available at Samsung HZ25W Gallery & Sony RX10 IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Sony RX10 IV
HZ25W | RX10 IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 IV over the Samsung HZ25W
RX10 IV | HZ25W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2017 | ![]() | July 2010 | Fresher by 87 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1440k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+1210k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung HZ25W and Sony RX10 IV
HZ25W | RX10 IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Samsung HZ25W vs Sony RX10 IV Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Samsung HZ25W comes with outer dimensions of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") with a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Sony RX10 IV has specifications of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") having a weight of 1095 grams (2.41 lbs).
Examine the Samsung HZ25W vs Sony RX10 IV in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the HZ25W and the RX10 IV.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edb35/edb350ab3c4965c81185d3af37b0ca0e4a31d7e2" alt="Samsung HZ25W vs Sony RX10 IV size comparison Samsung HZ25W vs Sony RX10 IV size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the HZ25W and RX10 IV is 70 and 52 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9cf3/e9cf33768f792f3960c408b1727344f1708b75fe" alt="Samsung HZ25W vs Sony RX10 IV top view buttons comparison Samsung HZ25W vs Sony RX10 IV top view buttons comparison"
Samsung HZ25W vs Sony RX10 IV Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizing just by viewing specifications. The visual underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the HZ25W and RX10 IV.
Plainly, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The HZ25W with its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony RX10 IV will render extra detail because of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The older HZ25W will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/935c5/935c58199f65bf72e5402955e65bb6f9eca1f2b6" alt="Samsung HZ25W vs Sony RX10 IV sensor size comparison Samsung HZ25W vs Sony RX10 IV sensor size comparison"
Samsung HZ25W vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b82cb/b82cb2e9ec8d52add21b29afe8205e47a7da2243" alt="Samsung HZ25W vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung HZ25W vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Samsung HZ25W vs Sony RX10 IV Specifications
Samsung HZ25W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung HZ25W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV |
Also called | WB5000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-07-06 | 2017-09-12 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 315 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-624mm (24.0x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 1,440k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 24.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.60 m | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 428 grams (0.94 pounds) | 1095 grams (2.41 pounds) |
Dimensions | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 photographs |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SC/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $350 | $1,698 |