Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB150F
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
- Also referred to as WB650
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB150F Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Samsung HZ35W and Samsung WB150F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras and both are sold by Samsung. The image resolution of the HZ35W (12MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe HZ35W was revealed 19 months before the WB150F which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the HZ35W scores versus the WB150F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung HZ35W and Samsung WB150F. The full galleries are available at Samsung HZ35W Gallery and Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Samsung WB150F
| HZ35W | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+154k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Samsung HZ35W
| WB150F | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | June 2010 | Fresher by 19 months |
Common features in the Samsung HZ35W and Samsung WB150F
| HZ35W | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Samsung HZ35W has got outer measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Samsung WB150F has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Examine the Samsung HZ35W and Samsung WB150F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the HZ35W against the WB150F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the HZ35W and WB150F is 91 and 93 respectively.
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing simply by going over specifications. The visual underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the HZ35W and WB150F.
Plainly, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should count on the Samsung WB150F to offer you more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The older HZ35W is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Samsung HZ35W | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung HZ35W | Samsung WB150F |
| Also called | WB650 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 614 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 245 grams (0.54 lb) | 188 grams (0.41 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | SLB-11A | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $300 | $230 |