Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB50F
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
- Additionally Known as WB650
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Announced January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB50F Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB50F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras and both of them are offered by Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the HZ35W (12MP) and WB50F (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe HZ35W was introduced 4 years prior to the WB50F which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the HZ35W grades versus the WB50F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung HZ35W & Samsung WB50F. The whole galleries are viewable at Samsung HZ35W Gallery & Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Samsung WB50F
| HZ35W | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+154k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Samsung HZ35W
| WB50F | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 43 months |
Common features in the Samsung HZ35W and Samsung WB50F
| HZ35W | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Samsung HZ35W enjoys outer dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Samsung WB50F has proportions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Examine the Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB50F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the HZ35W against the WB50F.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the HZ35W and WB50F is 91 and 92 respectively.
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes simply by checking a spec sheet. The pic here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the HZ35W and WB50F.
Clearly, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can expect to see the Samsung WB50F to give more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged HZ35W is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Samsung HZ35W | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung HZ35W | Samsung WB50F |
| Also called | WB650 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-06-16 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 614 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 16s | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 245 gr (0.54 lbs) | 207 gr (0.46 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | SLB-11A | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $300 | $180 |
